February 24, 2021
  • 10:30 am For White People Only: Anti-Racism Workshop Addresses Racial Bias and Unity
  • 2:43 pm Greatness Personified: Remembering Kobe Bryant
  • 10:02 am Straight Down the Chimney and Into Your (Digital) Hands: Special Holiday Edition of The Bulletin!
  • 2:44 pm Did You Wake up Looking this Beautiful?
  • 11:43 am A Long History for University’s Newest Major
  • 5:15 pm Issue 5 of Bulletin Live! Collector’s Item! Worth its Weight in Digital Paper!
  • 4:06 pm Special Election Issue
  • 4:03 pm Three best Latinx Halloween & Horror Short Films available now on HBO Max
  • 9:49 am Issue 3 of CSUDH Bulletin Live if You Want It
  • 3:24 pm Hispanic Heritage Month Update
  • 2:00 pm South Bay Economic Forecast Goes Virtual
  • 3:52 pm BREAKING NEWS: Classes for Spring to be Online, CSU Chancellor Announces
  • 9:39 am “Strikes” and Solidarity
  • 8:30 am March Into History: Just 5 in 1970, CSUDH Growth Shaped by Historic Event
  • 8:30 am Will the Bulletin Make Today Tomorrow?
  • 9:04 am Different Neighborhoods Warrant Rubber Bullets or Traffic Control For Protesters
  • 5:07 pm STAFF EDITORIAL: Even Socially Distant, We All Have to Work Together
  • 5:47 pm Transcript of CSUDH President Parham’s Coronavirus Announcement
  • 10:46 am Cal State Long Beach Suspends Face-to-Face Classes; CSUDH Discussing Contingency Plans
  • 5:26 pm Things Black People Should be Able to Get Away with This Month
  • 10:25 am Latinx Students Need a Place to Call Home
  • 2:35 pm Will Time Run Out Before Funds for PEGS? [UPDATED]
  • 8:41 am Year of the Rat? What’s That?
  • 6:20 am Artist Who Gave Life to Death and Inspired Countless Others Gets His Due at Dominguez Hills
  • 5:16 pm Why I’m Rooting for Dr. Cornel West
  • 5:00 pm Under Fire from the Feds, Vaping’s Future is Cloudy
  • 3:28 pm We’re Going to Need a Bigger Boat; Tsunami 3.0 Hits Campus, Enrollment Swells
  • 4:48 pm University Weathering a Wave of New Students
  • 9:21 pm The Bulletin’s Public Records Request Offers Springboard to Launch Gender Equity Discussion at CSUDH
  • 4:27 pm Black is the New Black: Raising the Capital on the “B” Word
  • 10:53 am Guns Up for Arrest: Student advocacy group pushes for CSU No Gun Zones–Including the Police
  • 4:09 pm Staff Editorial: Words on the First
  • 8:42 pm Carson Mayor Blasts Media, Landmark Libel Case in Keynote Address
  • 9:27 am Free Speech Week Calendar of Events Update
  • 6:02 am Food for Thought: 40% of Students are Food Insecure
  • 3:12 pm Academic Senate Rejects CSU GE Task Force & Report
  • 3:06 pm Work To Be Done
  • 5:56 pm ASI Elections: What You Need to Know
  • 8:02 pm CSUDH President Parham Announces Cancer Diagnosis
  • 9:47 am CSUDH Art Professor’s 20-Year Journey Results in First Local Showing of Film
  • 9:13 pm Free Speech or Free Hate area?
  • 9:08 pm CSUDH’s Best & Brightest Shine at Student Research Day
  • 9:05 pm Academic Senate Approves Gender Equity Task Force
  • 12:37 pm When Dr. Davis speaks, Toros Pay Close Attention
  • 3:38 pm Investing in the Future: Dr. Thomas A. Parham Reflects on the Past Eight Months and Contemplates​ the University’s Future
  • 3:24 pm Green Olive to Open By End of Feb; Starbucks Not Until Fall
  • 3:20 pm Gov. Newsom’s Proposed Budget Hailed for Extensive Funding Increases
  • 3:08 pm Out of the Classroom: Labor and Community Organizing Course Aims to Teach Students How to Organize for Social Justice
  • 2:54 pm The Other Route in Professional Sports
  • 9:02 am Hail to the New Chief, CSUDH President Thomas Parham
  • 3:36 pm Career Center Holds Major/Minor Fair
  • 5:34 pm After Unexpected Delay, Undocumented Becomes More Intimate Theatrical Production
  • 1:30 pm What to Expect When You’re Expecting New Buildings
  • 9:50 pm Academic Senate Roundup: Proposed Health Fee Increase, Chancellor Visit, Anti-Racism Challenge Discussed
  • 9:15 am Dying To Be Thin, Living To Tell the Tale
  • 9:00 am I love you a Latte
  • 9:00 am Struggling with Anxiety During a Pandemic
  • 9:00 am MSA Commitment to Social Justice Earns a Place on an $8 Million List
Story tips, concerns, questions?

By Brian Hinchion, Staff Reporter

Have you ever seen the sign “chemicals in this building may be known to cause cancer” usually posted outside of apartment complexes, restaurants and innocuous buildings throughout the state of California? I’ve always been pretty taken aback by the signs especially since you’re usually entering the building itself when you see it. 

Trepidation, reluctance and fear are just some of the emotions and feelings I have felt upon seeing these warning notices. It’s quite jarring when you’re going to your dentist or grabbing a burger and that’s the last thing you see before sitting in the waiting room or chowing down on your food in that very building. Is this burger worth it or maybe I’ll pass on my standard teeth cleaning this time? 

Many buildings at California State University Dominguez Hills have this sign posted including the Loker Student Union. So, what are the origins of these notices, why are they so prevalent around the state and what do CSUDH students think of them being on campus?

When asking who is responsible for these signs, looking in the mirror would be a good start. Well, not necessarily you but the California voters who approved ballot measure 65 in 1986. 

According to the California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment’s website, Proposition 65 or the Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act was an initiative that aimed to protect California’s drinking water from carcinogenic chemicals. It also required businesses and buildings to notify citizens who come in contact with these establishments of carcinogenic chemicals on site. This law created hundreds of thousands of buildings around the state to bear the “this building may contain chemicals known to cause cancer” warnings. 

Many establishments have this warning as a way to comply with the law or choose to put it up to avoid litigation from the state or private citizens. Because of the prevalence of these notices, the result is an ominous and serious warning that goes largely unnoticed to many Californians living their daily lives.

For students and faculty of CSUDH, those interviewed agreed that the warning signs displayed on buildings on campus made them feel uneasy but ultimately would not do much to change their habits on campus.

“It’s nerve-wracking first of all, I pass by this building all day,” Eduardo Ramos, a criminal justice major, when referring to the Loker Student Union warning sign said. “It shows we should be aware of our surroundings.”

Max Rosas who works in the Office of Educational Partnerships on campus said it is worrying to see the Prop 65 warning signs on campus buildings and it changes the way he will look at spaces on campus. But both agreed these signs will not do much to alter how they navigate CSUDH.

The Prop 65 warning notifications aim to let people know possible harmful chemicals they may come across each day but also can trivialize the notices themselves when they are so common. If we see them constantly in the places we work, where we go to school and where we live it could downplay how serious we take the warnings in general.



Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: